HOME WEB NEWS IMAGES CLASSIFIEDS YELLOW PAGESPOLLS - SURVEYS WIKI COUNTRIES PHOTOS US UK INDIA
Cities Stocks Weather Movies Coupons Travel Blogs Health Horoscope Maps ASIA EUROPE Classifieds Yellow Pages
|
 1
|
|
|
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2008) |
| This article may not meet the general notability guideline or one of the following specific guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia: Biographies, Books, Companies, Fiction, Music, Neologisms, Numbers, Web content, or several proposals for new guidelines.
If you are familiar with the subject matter, please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability. The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject. If notability cannot be established, the article is more likely to be considered for redirection, merge or ultimately deletion, per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. This article has been tagged since February 2008. |
|
|
The quality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words. You can help Wikipedia by removing weasel words. |
The fat acceptance movement, also the size acceptance movement or fat liberation movement, is a grassroots effort to change societal attitudes towards individuals who are fat.Saguy, A.C., & Riley, K.W. (2005). "Weighing both sides: Morality, mortality and framing contests over obesity" Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. 30(5):869-921.Neumark-Sztainer, D. (1999). "The weight dilemma: A range of philosophical perspectives" International Journal of Obesity. 23(Suppl.2):S31-S37.Stürmer, S., Simon, B., Loewy, M., & Jörger, H. (2003). "The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement" Social Psychology Quartely. 66(1):71-82. The movement consists today of a diverse group of people, who have different beliefs about how best to address the widespread prejudice and discrimination against fat people in contemporary Western societies.Himes, S.M., and Thomson, J.K. (2007), "Fat stigmatization in television shows and movies: A content analysis", Obesity, 15(3):712-718.Finkelstein, L.M., Demuth, R.L.F., and Sweeny, D.L.(2007), "Bias against overweight job applicants: Further exploration of when and why", Human Resource Management, 46(2):203-222.King, E.B., Shapiro, J.R., Hebl, M.R., Singletary, S.L., and Turner, S. (2006), "The stigma of obesity in customer service: A mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination", Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3):579-593.Schwartz, M.B., Chambliss, H.O., Brownell, K.D., Blair, S.N., and Billington, C. (2003), "Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity", Obesity Research, 11(9):1033-1039.
Generally dated to the 1970s, the 1980s and 1990s witnessed an increase in activist organizations, publications, and conferences.[citation needed] The contemporary movement perceives negative societal attitudes as persistent, and based on the presumption that obesity reflects negative character traits.[citation needed]
Contents |
Fat activism covers several fronts but generally can be described as attempting to change societal, internal, and medical attitudes about fat people.
The movement argues that fat people are targets of hatred and discrimination,[citation needed] with fat women in particular subject to more social pressure. Hatred is seen in multiple places including media outlets, where fat people are often ridiculed http://www.health24.com/dietnfood/Weight_Centre/15-51-89,14715.aspor held up as objects of pity[citation needed]. Discrimination comes in the form of lack of equal accessibility to transportation and employment.
The movement also argues[attribution needed] that people of all shapes and sizes should accept themselves as they are, at any size. Thus, it promotes "health at every size," which aims to place one\'s mental and physical health before physical appearance and size.
Through the works of authors such as Paul Campos and Sandy Szwarc, the fat acceptance movement has argued that doctors should treat health problems of people of all sizes, recognizing that health issues are not defined by weight and are shared by people of all sizes, fat and thin. Some in the movement have argued that the health risks of fatness and obesity have been greatly exaggerated, and used as cover for cultural and aesthetic prejudices against fat.
Fat activism faces challenges.[citation needed] Organizations such as the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA) and the International Size Acceptance Association (ISAA) are small in number, and people interested in the movement tend to be clustered in larger cities and spread across medium- to small-sized web communities. NAAFA changed leadership around the turn of the century.[citation needed]
The history of this movement is difficult to chart because of its grassroots nature, although it originated in the late 1960s and 1970s. Like other social movements from this time period, the fat acceptance movement, initially known as "Fat Pride," "Fat Power," or "Fat Liberation," often consisted of people acting in an impromptu fashion. To offer one example, a "Fat-in" was staged in New York\'s Central Park in 1967."Curves Have Their Day in Park; 500 at a \'Fat-in\' Call for Obesity," New York Times. June 5, 1967, pg. 54 Called by a radio personality, Steve Post, the "Fat-in" consisted of a group of 500 people, eating, carrying signs and photographs of Sophia Loren (an actress famous for her figure), and burning diet books.
Several groups were formed in this period that promoted a fat acceptance agenda. The "Fat Pride" group, NAAFA, initially called the National Association to Aid Fat Americans, subsequently renamed the National Association for Advancement of Fat Acceptance, was begun in 1969 by William Fabrey. This group was at its inception more of a social club. A more radical group, the Fat Underground, was founded in 1973. The group had begun as a chapter of NAAFA, but had quickly developed an activist philosophy more radical than the group. To be more specific, they were inspired by the philosophy of the Radical Therapy Collective, a feminist collective that believed that many psychological problems were caused by oppressive social institutions and practices. The group consisted of a number of members including the founding members Sara Fishman (then going by Aldebaran) and Judy Freespirit, and subsequently Lynn McAffee. They quickly developed into a group that took issue with the developing science against obesity. One of their central sayings, "A diet is a cure that doesn\'t work for a disease that doesn\'t exist," reflects their dedication to fat acceptance as well as fat activism.http://www.largesse.net/Archives/FU/index.html
Shortly afterwards, Fishman moved to New Haven, CT, where she, along with Karen Scott-Jones, founded the New Haven Fat Liberation Front, an organization similar to the Fat Underground in its scope and focus. In 1983, they collaborated to publish a germinal book in the field of Fat Activism, Shadow on a Tightrope.Shadow on a Tightrope: Writings by Women on Fat Oppression, eds. Lisa Schoenfielder and Barb Wieser. Iowa City, IA: Aunt Lute Books, 1983 The book consists of some activist position papers, initially distributed by the Fat Underground, as well as collections of poems and essays from other writers.
|
|
This section is written like an advertisement. Please help rewrite this section from a neutral point of view. (February 2008) |
Fat liberation has been addressed as well in a number of zines, many representing activist communities. Among them are Marilyn Wann\'s Fat!So? beginning in 1993, Nomy Lamm\'s I\'m So Fucking Beautiful, and the collectively produced \'zine FaT GiRL -- the \'zine for fat dykes and the women who want them. More Recently, Sabrina Darling has collaborated with other members of the new generation of fat liberation to release the zine Two By Four, Krissy Durden has produced the zine Figure 8 since 2001 and Max Airborne and Cherry Midnight have produced Size Queen: For Queen-size Queers and Our Loyal Subjects.
In addition to zines, there has recently been a steady stream of books with a fat activist agenda including Wann\'s book of the same title as her zine (1998), Sondra Solovay\'s "Tipping the Scales of Justice: Fighting Weight-Based Discrimination" (2000);\'Largely Happy -- changing your mind about your body\' by Lynda Finn; \'Don\'t Diet\' by Professor Dale Atrens and a collection of short stories by fat people (What Are You Looking At? 2003). Beginning in the earlier literature, there were criticisms of the prevailing scientific view that fat is unhealthy. A number of writers and activists have attacked this viewpoint, including more recently Paul Campos in his \'The Obesity Myth\' (2004) republished as \'The Diet Myth\', and Sandy Szwarc\'s in-depth examination of obesity research in the online magazine "Tech Central Station."http://www.tcsdaily.com/Authors.aspx?id=238
In recent years, there is an emerging body of fat political and sociological studies, some with a fat activist agenda, developing within the academy. The American Popular Culture Association has an area in fat studies and regularly includes panels on the subject. In addition, student groups with a fat activist agenda have emerged in a number of colleges including Hampshire, Smith, and Antioch colleges.
Susan Stinson\'s novels and poetry such as Belly Songs (1993) and Venus of Chalk (2004) have integrated the insights of fat liberation into literature. Several collections of short writing on fat have been published in recent years, including \'What Are You Looking At?: The First Fat Fiction Anthology\' (2003); Scoot Over, Skinny: The Fat Nonfiction Anthology\' (2005); and Susan Koppelman\'s Strange History of Suzanne LaFleshe and other stories of women and fatness (2003).
Recently, fat performance art has made an impact in the fight against sizeism. Groups like The Padded Lillies, Big Burlesque and the Fat Bottom Revue and radical cheerleading groups like F.A.T.A.S.S pdx and The Bod Squad have received significant attention, as have drag troupes like the Royal Renegades: The Philadelphia Drag Kings, who feature a variety of body types in their shows.
There has been a flourishing of national conferences devoted to the subject of fat activism, including NOLOSE, the conference of the former National Organization for Lesbians of SizE (now just known as NOLOSE); NAAFA\'s annual convention held alternately on the west and east coasts; and the largest conference, Stacy Bias\'s FatGirl Speaks in Portland, Oregon.
Finally, in recent years a thriving community has grown up online, centered around bloggers promoting the ideas of fat acceptance. Some notable examples include Kate Harding\'s Shapely Prose, Big Fat Blog, and The F-Word.
Wikinews has related news:
Obesity and the Fat Acceptance Movement: Kira Nerusskaya speaks
As it has expanded, the fat acceptance movement has faced internal issues.
One point of contention in the movement is found between those fat people who are attempting to lose weight and those who are not. Opponents of weight loss attempts cite the high failure rate of all permanent weight loss attempts (95-98%), and the many dangers of "yoyo weight fluctuations" and weight loss surgeries. (There are many citations, starting with Sandy Szwarc\'s list of links at [1], as well as books by William Bennett, Joel Gurin, Paul Campos, etc. as delineated below. A USDA discussion of the recent U.C. Davis study suggesting that fat acceptance maintains and improves health more than dieting may be found at [2].)
Due to intrinsic linguistic misunderstandings and differing definitions of the word "acceptance," some "fat activists" believe the phrase refers to any fat person fighting for equal rights and opportunities, regardless of whether or not that person believes that the pursuit of reduction in a person\'s body mass is feasible. Other "fat activists" define "fat acceptance" more strictly, applying that phrase only to fat people who are not pursuing a reduction in their body mass, and use phrases such as "fat activist" to describe fat people and "allies" working more generally on civil rights issues pertaining to fat people.
An additional issue with regard to language is that many in the fat acceptance movement find the terms "obese" and "overweight" offensive, as they are often used to make overtly prejudiced statements seem more clinical or scientific. The word "fat" is generally preferred.
In practice, the only way to know the position of any particular individual member of the group on weight loss attempts is to ask, or read specific position papers on the issue.
Fat acceptance advocates\' positions have sparked criticism.[citation needed] Some critics[citation needed], while acknowledging that fat and obese individuals are subject to inappropriate discrimination or pressure, contend that fat acceptance advocates\' goal of unconditional acceptance of obesity is itself unhealthy.[citation needed] They contend that accepting fatness will make people less likely to aspire to achieve a healthy weight.[citation needed] Other criticisms state that obesity causes medical problems.[citation needed] Public health officials[citation needed] regard widespread obesity as posing significant costs to society. Despite advocates\' claims to the contrary, some studies[citation needed] show that fat people are more likely than others to be in poor health, at a time when health care costs are rising: In 2006, the CDC estimated that 10 percent of current health care costs are due to obesity [3]. However, a recent Dutch study came to the conclusion that while obese individuals cause higher annual health care costs during their lifetime, their total health care costs over the span of a lifetime are lower than the costs caused by "healthy-living" (non-smoking with a BMI between 18.5 and 25) individuals due to higher average life expectancy of this group. Van Baal, P.H.M., Polder, J.J., De Wit, G.A., Hoogenveen, R.T., Feenstra, T.L., Boshuizen, H.C., et al. (2008). "Lifetime medical costs of obesity: Prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure", PLoS Medicine 5(2):e29, accessed Feb 16, 2008 at [4] Additionally, the common[citation needed] fat acceptance mantra that "diets don\'t work" is considered by some critics[citation needed] to be an oversimplification that may discourage even responsible and potentially beneficial changes in eating habits. [5]
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia
